[redrol]

with tips

63 Hz "abdomen"
125 Hz "chest"
250 Hz "oo"
500 Hz "o"
1000 Hz "ah"
2000 Hz "a"
4000 Hz "ee"
8000 Hz "s"
16000 Hz "ts"


It is not about the fundamental frequencies or overall bandwidth of the sounds, but the characteristic frequency ranges.

You are so far off its not funny. this is completely not true

 

[KinGensai]

with tips

You are so far off its not funny. this is completely not true

Elaborate? It's not his mnemonic btw, that's from audio university's video, and it's a mnemonic I use to ID those ranges by ear, so it clearly has some merit.

 

[71 dB]

with tips

You are so far off its not funny. this is completely not true

Why don't you tell us morons how it is if you know better? I am very surprised how much criticism "my list" has got.

 

[redrol]

I didnt say anyone was a moron, ok? There is no way for a human to make a 16k tone by going TSSS. 63 hz is so much lower than a chest type of thing.. Just off by a magnitude.

 

[AussieMick]

I didnt say anyone was a moron, ok? There is no way for a human to make a 16k tone by going TSSS. 63 hz is so much lower than a chest type of thing.. Just off by a magnitude.

You haven’t watched the video, have you? It’s not saying that sound produces 16khz.

 

[redrol]

then how is it useful? Just get a freakin tone generator and listen to the actual frequencies

 

[KinGensai]

then how is it useful? Just get a freakin tone generator and listen to the actual frequencies

You know... it might be in your best interest to do at least a cursory overview of the context before saying embarrassing stuff like this.

 

[redrol]

If it helps MIXING songs, I guess. I disagree because EEE is not 4k and just because modifying a static blast makes something that could be interpreted as an EE doesn't make it useful or true.

 

[bigshot]

then how is it useful? Just get a freakin tone generator and listen to the actual frequencies

...and get an equalizer and dial the frequencies in and out of music so you can hear where it sits.

 

[KinGensai]

@redrol
Ok, that's more fair as a criticism. It's helpful for me, so I'm using it until I no longer need it. It doesn't even have to be remotely related to the associated stimuli in any way to be useful, it'll still help memory recall.

 

[redrol]

Fair enough. I do get where this guy is coming from. Maybe I don't have the right wires crossed in my brain to get the vowel sounds out of eq.

 

[geoffkait]

Some examples of audiophile devices that would probably defy any kind of testing in the tradition sense, I.e., measuring frequency response or dynamic range or SNR. Or testing in any other sense.

Tip Toes
SILVER Rainbow Foil
The Green Pen
Difference between silver and copper cable or fuse
The Red x Coordinate Pen
Mpingo disc
Shakti Stone
Cable directionality
Fuse directionality
The Tice Clock
WA Quantum Chip
CD demagnetizer
Schumann frequency 7.83 Hz
CD laser scattered light absorber
SteinMusic Harmonizer
CD optical enhancer

 

[71 dB]

How are products that defy any kind of testing in the tradition sense developed? Is it all just trusting blindly your feelings?

 

[Syan25]

I don't anything can be truly objective.

 

[Redcarmoose]

Some examples of audiophile devices that would probably defy any kind of testing in the tradition sense, I.e., measuring frequency response or dynamic range or SNR. Or testing in any other sense.

Tip Toes
SILVER Rainbow Foil
The Green Pen
Difference between silver and copper cable or fuse
The Red x Coordinate Pen
Mpingo disc
Shakti Stone
Cable directionality
Fuse directionality
The Tice Clock
WA Quantum Chip
CD demagnetizer
Schumann frequency 7.83 Hz
CD laser scattered light absorber
SteinMusic Harmonizer
CD optical enhancer

Whiskey may work better than a few of those.