It's so remarkable to see all the writhing, looking consummately ridiculous as you try to attack someone who's indisputably one of the most highly-regarded experts in digital audio in the world, who knows a thousand times more about audio than all of you put together, especially when you can't disprove literally one word he says.
That’s seriously impressive, how many ways is it possible to be wrong in just one single sentence?
1. I already disproved more than “
one word he says”, for example the audibility of jitter, with actual quoted science, so the last part of your sentence is clearly false.
2. You still don’t get the “burden of proof” despite it being explained to you and it being highlighted on the landing page of this subforum. Again, it is not for us to disprove what “he says”, it is for him to prove or you as you are referencing him and without any such proof we are perfectly entitled to dismiss what “he says”!
3. Rob Watts is NOT “
one of the most highly-regarded experts in digital audio in the world”, you just made that up! He certainly has expertise but is not “one of the most highly-regarded”, except by some audiophiles.
4. The fact I’ve just disputed your claim proves that your assertion, that he’s “
indisputably one of the most most highly-regarded experts”, is in fact disputable.
5. What have his claims of audibility got to do with digital audio anyway? Audibility is a question of acoustic sound and psychoacoustics, so even if he were an expert in digital audio that’s irrelevant and according to the video you posted, he doesn’t even know what psychoacoustics is or what it studies, let alone have anything even approaching expertise!
6. As already mentioned, an “appeal to authority” is a fallacy and therefore a ridiculous argument. It’s even more ridiculous as the authority you’re appealing to is NOT an authority. And more ridiculous still as you’ve been complaining about a “complete lack of science” but yet again you yourself have provided none and instead only provided the exact opposite, a fallacy! Now that’s funny!
7. You obviously cannot know what I and others here know about audio and therefore your claim that Rob Watts knows “
a thousand times more than all of you put together” is just another made-up false assertion!
There’s probably more but being wrong in 7 ways in just one sentence is a great achievement, even for an audiophile! lol
It's like watching 5 year-old students shoot spitballs at Einstein before they run back and hide in their church.
Don’t you even know who Einstein was or what he accomplished? Has Rob Watts ever published even one peer reviewed scientific paper, let alone papers that have changed our understanding of physics or won a Nobel prize. Name just one thing he’s ever contributed to science! Don’t you know that an analogy has to be analogous? lol. And, apart from you, no one here runs back and hides in their church!
G